<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.2.1" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Full Service Online &#038; Digital Marketing Agency: Altogether Digital</title>
	<link>http://www.altogetherdigital.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 17 May 2008 06:20:11 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.2.1</generator>

	<item>
		<title>Comment on Billie Piper, Blogging And Bondage. Oh My. by Custard Surgery &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Snow Cherries From France</title>
		<link>http://www.altogetherdigital.com/20070928/billie-piper-blogging-and-bondage-oh-my/#comment-10174</link>
		<author>Custard Surgery &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Snow Cherries From France</author>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 May 2008 14:11:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.altogetherdigital.com/20070928/billie-piper-blogging-and-bondage-oh-my/#comment-10174</guid>
		<description>[...] recommend aussi La Lectrice, Les Valeuses, Belle De Jour [le original, ne pas le crappy emission avec Billie Piper en sous-vestment onereuses], Delicatessen, et Weekend pour la scene en which un femme qui resembler un peu de Bardot parler a [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] recommend aussi La Lectrice, Les Valeuses, Belle De Jour [le original, ne pas le crappy emission avec Billie Piper en sous-vestment onereuses], Delicatessen, et Weekend pour la scene en which un femme qui resembler un peu de Bardot parler a [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Bringing A TV Show Back From The Dead: This Is Nuts! by T-minus 7 days at ProductionNinja.com</title>
		<link>http://www.altogetherdigital.com/20080205/bringing-a-tv-show-back-from-the-dead-this-is-nuts/#comment-10083</link>
		<author>T-minus 7 days at ProductionNinja.com</author>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Apr 2008 01:33:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.altogetherdigital.com/20080205/bringing-a-tv-show-back-from-the-dead-this-is-nuts/#comment-10083</guid>
		<description>[...] Altogether - Bringing a TV show back from the dead: This is Nuts! [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Altogether - Bringing a TV show back from the dead: This is Nuts! [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Google Opens up Brand Name Bidding by Two Wrongs Don&#8217;t Make A Right - Or Are There Exceptions? &#187; Affiliate Marketing Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.altogetherdigital.com/20080408/google-opens-up-brand-name-bidding/#comment-10058</link>
		<author>Two Wrongs Don&#8217;t Make A Right - Or Are There Exceptions? &#187; Affiliate Marketing Blog</author>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Apr 2008 12:34:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.altogetherdigital.com/20080408/google-opens-up-brand-name-bidding/#comment-10058</guid>
		<description>[...] Google Opens up Brand Name Bidding [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Google Opens up Brand Name Bidding [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on SES London 2008 Summary by Malini</title>
		<link>http://www.altogetherdigital.com/20080222/ses-london-2008-summary/#comment-10050</link>
		<author>Malini</author>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Apr 2008 01:40:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.altogetherdigital.com/20080222/ses-london-2008-summary/#comment-10050</guid>
		<description>Hey Ciaran - just caught you at yesterday's SMX Syndey. Thanks for a great talk. Any chances of getting the slides online?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Ciaran - just caught you at yesterday&#8217;s SMX Syndey. Thanks for a great talk. Any chances of getting the slides online?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Why A New Window Is Akin To A Barrier To (Re) Entry by Jaamit</title>
		<link>http://www.altogetherdigital.com/20080306/why-a-new-window-is-akin-to-a-barrier-to-re-entry/#comment-10040</link>
		<author>Jaamit</author>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Apr 2008 11:33:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.altogetherdigital.com/20080306/why-a-new-window-is-akin-to-a-barrier-to-re-entry/#comment-10040</guid>
		<description>I agree with a lot of the comments above - I always open in new tabs (i am constantly using the shift button) and get frustrated with links opening in the same window, especially with blogs where links are spread throughout the article and you click on something before you've finished reading the article.

However it IS annoying if you don't have tabs enabled.

Maybe we need a "target=_newtab" attribute for links?  But in the meantime, would there be a way of detecting whether tabs are enabled and having separate behaviours?  You could detect browser version (less than or equal to ie6 etc) but that doesn't get around the fact that you can switch off tabs in ie7 and firefox...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with a lot of the comments above - I always open in new tabs (i am constantly using the shift button) and get frustrated with links opening in the same window, especially with blogs where links are spread throughout the article and you click on something before you&#8217;ve finished reading the article.</p>
<p>However it IS annoying if you don&#8217;t have tabs enabled.</p>
<p>Maybe we need a &#8220;target=_newtab&#8221; attribute for links?  But in the meantime, would there be a way of detecting whether tabs are enabled and having separate behaviours?  You could detect browser version (less than or equal to ie6 etc) but that doesn&#8217;t get around the fact that you can switch off tabs in ie7 and firefox&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Why A New Window Is Akin To A Barrier To (Re) Entry by Chungaiz</title>
		<link>http://www.altogetherdigital.com/20080306/why-a-new-window-is-akin-to-a-barrier-to-re-entry/#comment-10039</link>
		<author>Chungaiz</author>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Apr 2008 10:15:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.altogetherdigital.com/20080306/why-a-new-window-is-akin-to-a-barrier-to-re-entry/#comment-10039</guid>
		<description>I hate new window openings. How bout open in new tab?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I hate new window openings. How bout open in new tab?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Google Opens up Brand Name Bidding by Rob Reid</title>
		<link>http://www.altogetherdigital.com/20080408/google-opens-up-brand-name-bidding/#comment-10038</link>
		<author>Rob Reid</author>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Apr 2008 09:02:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.altogetherdigital.com/20080408/google-opens-up-brand-name-bidding/#comment-10038</guid>
		<description>Big winners here will be affiliate networks and their affiliates. One wonders if Google will make an acquisition play for the likes of CJ or Trade Doubler in the medium term?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Big winners here will be affiliate networks and their affiliates. One wonders if Google will make an acquisition play for the likes of CJ or Trade Doubler in the medium term?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Google Opens up Brand Name Bidding by FreePSDLogo</title>
		<link>http://www.altogetherdigital.com/20080408/google-opens-up-brand-name-bidding/#comment-10035</link>
		<author>FreePSDLogo</author>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Apr 2008 12:32:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.altogetherdigital.com/20080408/google-opens-up-brand-name-bidding/#comment-10035</guid>
		<description>Google allows this now and it has been done in the past but the brands will not be very happy about this, I remember bidding on a brand term and I got an email about 1 hour after I did it telling me to stop doing it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Google allows this now and it has been done in the past but the brands will not be very happy about this, I remember bidding on a brand term and I got an email about 1 hour after I did it telling me to stop doing it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Guinness Tipping Point Spoof By Pot Noodle by Gareth</title>
		<link>http://www.altogetherdigital.com/20080320/guinness-tipping-point-spoof-by-pot-noodle/#comment-10033</link>
		<author>Gareth</author>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Apr 2008 09:35:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.altogetherdigital.com/20080320/guinness-tipping-point-spoof-by-pot-noodle/#comment-10033</guid>
		<description>Ok, so I don't have Guinness' £10m budget, or Pot Noodles or that matter, but I had a go at creating a tipping point spoof in an office to promote a new site I'm working on for a broadband provider. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IWqk-JQlUaw
Not sure I'll beat the tipping pot but I liked it!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ok, so I don&#8217;t have Guinness&#8217; £10m budget, or Pot Noodles or that matter, but I had a go at creating a tipping point spoof in an office to promote a new site I&#8217;m working on for a broadband provider. <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IWqk-JQlUaw" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IWqk-JQlUaw</a><br />
Not sure I&#8217;ll beat the tipping pot but I liked it!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Why A New Window Is Akin To A Barrier To (Re) Entry by Seth</title>
		<link>http://www.altogetherdigital.com/20080306/why-a-new-window-is-akin-to-a-barrier-to-re-entry/#comment-9987</link>
		<author>Seth</author>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Mar 2008 22:18:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.altogetherdigital.com/20080306/why-a-new-window-is-akin-to-a-barrier-to-re-entry/#comment-9987</guid>
		<description>i definitely prefer links opening in a new window. with settings so that links open in tabs rather than new browser windows i find this the best way to manage what i have open.

i find that whilst the content from the initial site might be good, enough to go back again, it might not be as relevant as the journey that going to other sites can often lead to, for whatever it is that you are looking for at that particular moment. this means you could end up navigating people away from the site.

it used to be less manageable to have loads of windows opening on the taskbar, but tabs in browsers rectify that.

i'm one of those who tends to have the main focal site open, where i started out, and then builds up the picture with opened tabs to other sites, which themselves can be developed if necessary. new opened links can often have some useful information, but are also in some way tangential, so having them open in new windows gives them a sort of secondary feel to where you started off.

it really depends on the content of the site at the start though, and how much of a 'parent' type site it is; with something like google, it is a natural start point due to its nature, not an end in itself, so opening in the same window makes sense.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i definitely prefer links opening in a new window. with settings so that links open in tabs rather than new browser windows i find this the best way to manage what i have open.</p>
<p>i find that whilst the content from the initial site might be good, enough to go back again, it might not be as relevant as the journey that going to other sites can often lead to, for whatever it is that you are looking for at that particular moment. this means you could end up navigating people away from the site.</p>
<p>it used to be less manageable to have loads of windows opening on the taskbar, but tabs in browsers rectify that.</p>
<p>i&#8217;m one of those who tends to have the main focal site open, where i started out, and then builds up the picture with opened tabs to other sites, which themselves can be developed if necessary. new opened links can often have some useful information, but are also in some way tangential, so having them open in new windows gives them a sort of secondary feel to where you started off.</p>
<p>it really depends on the content of the site at the start though, and how much of a &#8216;parent&#8217; type site it is; with something like google, it is a natural start point due to its nature, not an end in itself, so opening in the same window makes sense.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
