<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.2.1" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Unite Take On M&#038;S With AdWords. Why Waste The Budget?</title>
	<link>http://www.altogetherdigital.com/20080227/unite-take-on-ms-with-adwords-why-waste-the-budget/</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 20 Aug 2008 19:09:38 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.2.1</generator>

	<item>
		<title>By: Moose</title>
		<link>http://www.altogetherdigital.com/20080227/unite-take-on-ms-with-adwords-why-waste-the-budget/#comment-9819</link>
		<author>Moose</author>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Feb 2008 12:01:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.altogetherdigital.com/20080227/unite-take-on-ms-with-adwords-why-waste-the-budget/#comment-9819</guid>
		<description>Marks &#38; Spencer have numerous variations &#38; mispellings &#38; abbreviations, you can pick up keywords at the cheapest prices &#38; run an extensive campaign at minumum cost &#38; maximum impact .. and the ads will show. It's just knowing how.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Marks &amp; Spencer have numerous variations &amp; mispellings &amp; abbreviations, you can pick up keywords at the cheapest prices &amp; run an extensive campaign at minumum cost &amp; maximum impact .. and the ads will show. It&#8217;s just knowing how.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ciaran</title>
		<link>http://www.altogetherdigital.com/20080227/unite-take-on-ms-with-adwords-why-waste-the-budget/#comment-9818</link>
		<author>Ciaran</author>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Feb 2008 10:18:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.altogetherdigital.com/20080227/unite-take-on-ms-with-adwords-why-waste-the-budget/#comment-9818</guid>
		<description>Exactly my point - the PR, and blended search, have done the job for them.

Why do you say it would never work? Would it not fall under the political rules of AdWords? It seems that it did work, but just not for very long (one wonders what Unite's budget was).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Exactly my point - the PR, and blended search, have done the job for them.</p>
<p>Why do you say it would never work? Would it not fall under the political rules of AdWords? It seems that it did work, but just not for very long (one wonders what Unite&#8217;s budget was).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom</title>
		<link>http://www.altogetherdigital.com/20080227/unite-take-on-ms-with-adwords-why-waste-the-budget/#comment-9817</link>
		<author>Tom</author>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Feb 2008 10:14:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.altogetherdigital.com/20080227/unite-take-on-ms-with-adwords-why-waste-the-budget/#comment-9817</guid>
		<description>Me and Patrick were discussing this just now. It's obviously not been a failure since it got picked up by lots of news outlets which means good PR but I'm surprised that the newspapers didn't check their facts a little first.

Anyone who knows anything about PPC would know this would never work.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Me and Patrick were discussing this just now. It&#8217;s obviously not been a failure since it got picked up by lots of news outlets which means good PR but I&#8217;m surprised that the newspapers didn&#8217;t check their facts a little first.</p>
<p>Anyone who knows anything about PPC would know this would never work.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Moose</title>
		<link>http://www.altogetherdigital.com/20080227/unite-take-on-ms-with-adwords-why-waste-the-budget/#comment-9815</link>
		<author>Moose</author>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Feb 2008 06:56:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.altogetherdigital.com/20080227/unite-take-on-ms-with-adwords-why-waste-the-budget/#comment-9815</guid>
		<description>I like your touch right at the bottom of the page.

"thank you for reading all the way to the bottom of the page"</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like your touch right at the bottom of the page.</p>
<p>&#8220;thank you for reading all the way to the bottom of the page&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
